RoybalFewell321

Now, there's certainly not something wrong with this, I only believe that authors who are doing this are missing possible traffic and/or consumers. Such source boxes will simply gain their site ranks in a... I run an article service on my site, and I am seeing an increasing number of articles being published, only for the backlink given in the Resource Box. This is probably due to the increasing number of PLR articles and material that is becoming available. Now, there's certainly not anything wrong with this, I just think that writers who are doing this are missing possible traffic and/or consumers. Such reference boxes will simply benefit their site rankings in incoming links that are valued by any search engine. Is this a bad thing? No. Navigating To linkemperor.com maybe provides lessons you could give to your co-worker. Where they're losing out is as follows. Much of the traffic to my article directory comes from search engines, by people searching for info on a particular subject. Now, this user types within their key-words, presses on the search field, and is given a list of relevant sites. They chose one, and are taken to the author's article. They browse the article about, say, snowboarding, feel 'This is interesting' and go to the author's reference field at the conclusion of the article to see what else they've to say on this subject. There, they look for a link to your site promotion portable ringers. Is the reader planning to be impressed, or thinking about this? Not so likely. Tell Us What You Think includes extra info concerning the inner workings of this hypothesis. They wish to check out snowboarding, not modify their phone. In my opinion one of three things can happen then: The audience leaves the entire site in disgust. The reader clicks on a link to your related article. The reader clicks on the related Google AdSense (or similar contextual promotion) ad. They don't click the author's reference link. That is a potential consumer dropped, quite probably for good. If you know any thing, you will seemingly desire to read about clicklinkflood - StreetFire Member in US. Yes, put a link in to your site in the resource field, but many article websites let many links, so for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s linked to the article subject too, and preferably put it in first, before you lose the customer. For additional information, please consider checking out: BIZESO BLOG: 5 PROVEN STRATEGIES TO FIND LINK TRADE PARTNERS. 'But my site does not have such a thing to do with that subject on it'! You can add something that does. Increase an article service, and have the source package saying 'To read more articles on this subject, go here.' Add a web directory, and have the writing say 'To view links to websites with this subject, go here.' Or just go to Click-bank, search for related projects, and have a link to them, using the link saying something such as 'If you prefer to find out more on this subject, buy this product.' Ideally, not a direct url to the product, but a cloaked or redirected one. Using this method, you still get that link to your website that you were after formerly, but, moreover, you've the chance to earn money from the audience in a new way. A win-win situation. Plus, you don't appear to be someone only submitting acquired content on any subject only for the benefit of the backlink it'll give you. A much more professional look. Is not it worth taking the time to produce greater use of one's source package?