MichellPendergast246

If you are not active in the search engine marketing group, January 21st, 2007 probably held no significance for you. But, if you are a se marketer or SEO, you possibly remember January 21st because the time that Wikipedia died. For the untrained eye, Wikipedia is exactly the exact same today as it had been 6 months ago. But, after you look below the top and take a peek, you can see one difference that has had an effect around the world of search engine optimization: NOFOLLOW. To discover additional info, we recommend people have a gaze at: read about http://www.slideshare.net/rolandfrasier/roland-frasier-traffic-conversion-presentation-january-2014/. For other viewpoints, please consider glancing at: get the facts. In the language of Matt Cutts, rel=nofollow capability is an easy way for a site to tell search-engines the web site cant or doesnt need to vouch for a link. Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was used mainly for blog comments. This served blog owners cut down on comment spam. I learned about our website talk by browsing Bing. NOFOLLOW was also utilized in some situations to represent a link, but this can be a whole other conflict which will need to be stored for an alternative report. We discovered site preview by searching webpages. The reason why that Wikipedias adoption of NOFOLLOW on each confident link caused many individuals considered it as one of the most hypocritical choice that Wikipedia may have made such a mix is. The reason that Wikipedia is now so common and performs so effectively in the SERPs is that bloggers and web site owners frequently reference Wikipedia. When they do this, they provide a link back to Wikipedia. Every time this process occurs, Wikipedia gains a tad bit more acceptance within the search engines. When Wikipedia decided to apply the tag, theyre telling the search engines that while we reference a website and may use content from it inside our report, we dont want you to give it any credit. Its because of this that lots of have started to view as a huge hypocrisy Wikipedia. Wikipedia could have chosen a different way of fighting spam that didnt punish quality web sites which deserve to be acknowledged by Wikipedia, although NOFOLLOW has probably lessen the amount of spam Wikipedia has to combat, but as much others have mentioned..