LopesGuimond973

What is less understood is why drug manufacturers spend millions for re-search o-n off-label uses for their products and services - uses that were never satisfied using the FDA when the drug was submitted for approval. Off-label use allows drug companies to have through the rear door what they might never, and I am talking about never, get away with by going directly to the FDA for approval for a new use of the solution - what is known today being an off-label use. Youd hope that scientists would not corrupt the commercial testing of-a new, or off-label, use of a drug to treat children by covering up their consulting fees from Big Pharma. I discovered Monheit Law Reports Two Zofran Lawsuits Filed After Researchers Link Anti-Nausea Drug To Cleft Palate by browsing webpages. But that is what happened. Harvard Drug Re-search Fraud and Cover-up How Off-Label Profiteering Works Medicine business money corrupts and impacts research. That is a given. Whats less understood is why drug manufacturers spend billions for research on off-label uses for their products - if the drug was submitted for approval uses that have been never satisfied with the FDA. Be taught more on our partner use with - Hit this webpage http://www.k5thehometeam.com/story/29393650/monheit-law-reports-two-zofran-lawsuits-filed-after-researchers-link-anti-nausea-drug-to-cleft-palate. Off-label use allows drug companies to obtain through the back door what they may never, and I mean never, get-away with by going straight to the FDA for approval for a new use of the product - whats known today as an off-label use. You would hope that researchers would not corrupt the analysis of-a new, or off-label, use-of a drug to deal with kids by covering up their consulting costs from Big Pharma. But thats what happened. More impor-tant than what happened is why it happened and at the bottom of all this is a terrible mistake the U.S. has made in allowing the exploitation of off-label use. The devil is in the details, therefore this is actually the story because it has unfolded. Leading Harvard professors studying off-label uses, the gold-mine of the drug industry, have violated National Institute of Health reporting requirements when over 10,000 continues to be obtained from a subject organization, based on the New York Times, Researchers Fail to Reveal Drug Pay June 8, 2008. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/08/us/08conflict.html?emex=1213070400en=9971013dfd33290aei=508720say20are20sorryst=cse is not enough. If people require to discover additional resources on http://www.cbsatlanta.com/story/29393650/monheit-law-reports-two-zofran-lawsuits-filed-after-researchers-link-anti-nausea-drug-to-cleft-palate, we know about many libraries you might think about pursuing. If Harvard does not fire them, itll be complicit in the cover-up. Put them off-campus. Ring the bell loud and clear that regardless of how renown or stellar, if you dont play by the principles, you can not play at all. And THEY should be forever banned by the NIH from receiving grants. Dont throw out the child with the bath water. Once correct abuse is supported, provide a chance to these scientists to polish their tarnished reputations. Visiting http://www.cbs8.com/story/29393650/monheit-law-reports-two-zofran-lawsuits-filed-after-researchers-link-anti-nausea-drug-to-cleft-palate maybe provides tips you should use with your co-worker. Allow them to conduct research under the supervision of a responsible owner who knows that veritas, means truth, reliability, honesty, and uprightness and that its more than just a motto. Forward. Richard Alexander http://www.alexanderinjury.com.