사용자:O'mearaScull963

인디사이드위키
93.104.215.14 (토론) 사용자의 2020년 10월 8일 (목) 18:31 판 (새 문서: 5 Reproducibility Tests You Can Use For Estimating Uncertainty Two necessary constraints on the replicability of scientific results relaxation in limits to the precision of measureme...)

(차이) ← 이전 판 | 최신판 (차이) | 다음 판 → (차이)
이동: 둘러보기, 검색

5 Reproducibility Tests You Can Use For Estimating Uncertainty

Two necessary constraints on the replicability of scientific results relaxation in limits to the precision of measurement and the potential for altered results because of typically subtle variation in the strategies and steps carried out in a scientific examine. We expressly consider each here, as they can each have a profound affect on the replicability of scientific studies. A Gage R and R research is a designed experiment to review the variation in measurement outcomes. The experiment is design to find out how a lot variation is because of the test methodology and how much is because of the operators. Accuracy is set by comparing the instrumental values to a identified standard.

The first to stress the significance of reproducibility in science was the Irish chemist Robert Boyle, in England in the 17th century. Boyle's air pump was designed to generate and examine vacuum, which on the time was a very controversial idea. Indeed, distinguished philosophers similar to René Descartes and Thomas Hobbes denied the very risk of vacuum existence. Historians of science Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer, of their 1985 e-book Leviathan and the Air-Pump, describe the talk between Boyle and Hobbes, ostensibly over the character of vacuum, as basically an argument about how useful knowledge should be gained. Boyle, a pioneer of the experimental methodology, maintained that the foundations of knowledge should be constituted by experimentally produced details, which can be made believable to a scientific neighborhood by their reproducibility.

In 2017, an article published in Scientific Data advised that this is probably not adequate and that the whole analysis context ought to be disclosed. In 2015, psychology became the primary discipline to conduct and publish an open, registered empirical research of reproducibility known as the Reproducibility Project. A group of 270 researchers from all over the world collaborated to copy one hundred empirical studies from three high psychology journals.

The repeatability of an instrument is how shut the same operator, using the same measurement procedures, can duplicate the measurement of a check sample on the same instrument over a brief period of time. The reproducibility of an instrument is how shut the measurements of a single test sample are when the same measurement procedures are used however when the operator, the instrument and/or the laboratory are modified.

Measurements made by the same operator on the identical instrument utilizing the same process over a protracted time period can be used to find out reproducibility. Psychology has seen a renewal of inner considerations about irreproducible results. Researchers showed in a 2006 examine that, of 141 authors of a publication from the American Psychology Association empirical articles, 103 (73%) did not respond with their information over a six-month period. In a comply with up examine printed in 2015, it was discovered that 246 out of 394 contacted authors of papers in APA journals didn't share their data upon request (sixty two%). In a 2012 paper, it was suggested that researchers ought to publish data along with their works, and a dataset was launched alongside as an illustration.