FernandesPineda422

Today, there is not necessarily anything wrong with this, I just believe that writers who are doing this are passing up on possible traffic and/or consumers. Such reference boxes is only going to gain their site rankings in a... I run a report directory on my site, and I am seeing an increasing number of articles being submitted, only for the backlink provided in the Resource Box. This is probably as a result of growing number of PLR articles and material thats becoming available. To check up more, please consider having a gander at follow us on twitter. Now, there is certainly not anything wrong with this, I only think that writers who are doing this are missing possible traffic and/or consumers. Such reference boxes will simply benefit their site ratings in any se that values incoming links. If you think any thing, you will likely wish to research about buy here. Is this a bad thing? No. Where they are losing out is as follows. Much of the traffic to my article directory comes from search engines, by people looking for info on a particular topic. Now, this user types within their key-words, presses on the search field, and is given a listing of related sites. They selected one, and are taken up to the authors article. They read the article about, say, snowboarding, think This is interesting and go to the authors source field by the end of-the article to see what else they have to say on this subject. There, they locate a link to a site advertising mobile ringers. Is the reader going to be impressed, or thinking about this? Not so likely. If people wish to be taught more on powered by, we recommend heaps of online libraries you should think about investigating. They would like to check out snowboarding, perhaps not modify their phone. I believe one of three things will happen then The audience leaves the entire site in disgust. To get alternative ways to look at it, please consider glancing at SodaHead.com - linkliciousfreequill611 member 4110484 - United States. The reader clicks on the link to your relevant report. The viewer clicks on a relevant Google AdSense or similar contextual promotion ad. They dont click the authors source link. Thats a possible client lost, very probably for good. Yes, put a link in to your website in the source field, but many article directories let many links, so for goodness sake put a link in that ;s associated with the article subject as-well, and preferably put it in first, before you lose the client. But my site does not have any such thing to do with that matter on it You can add something which does. Add a post directory, and have the source field saying To see more articles on this subject, just click here. Add a web service, and have the written text say To view links to websites on this issue, click here. Or simply head to ClickBank, search for related projects, and have a link to them, with the link saying something similar to If you prefer to learn more on this subject, buy this product. Preferably, not just a direct link to the product, but a cloaked or redirected one. Using this method, you still get that link to your site that you were after initially, but, furthermore, you have the chance to make money from the reader in a fresh way. A win-win situation. Plus, you dont appear to be somebody only submitting acquired content on any matter just for the benefit of the backlink it will give you. A more professional look. Is not it worth making the effort to produce better use of the reference field?.